Brakes Plus, a 5,148-Square-Foot Net-Leased Property in Goodyear Sells for $3.555 Million

GOODYEAR, Arizona – Marcus & Millichap (NYSE: MMI), a leading commercial real estate brokerage firm specializing in investment sales, financing, research and advisory services, announced today the sale of Brakes Plus, a 5,148-square-foot net-leased property located in Goodyear, Arizona.

According to Ryan Sarbinoff, regional manager of the firm’s Phoenix office, the asset sold for $3,555,000 ($690 PSF).

Mark Ruble and Chris Lind, investment specialists in Marcus & Millichap’s Phoenix office, had the exclusive listing to market the property on behalf of the seller, a limited liability company. The buyer, a private investor, was procured by Lind and Ruble.

Built in 2021, Brakes Plus is primely located at 760 North Estrella Parkway in Goodyear, Arizona. The asset is visible to 36,000 cars per day along North Estrella Parkway and accessible to 152,209 residents within a five-mile radius. Goodyear is one of the top 10 fastest growing cities in the Nation according to U.S. Census Data, where households and population is projected to increase 15 to 17 percent in the immediate area by 2026.




March 2022 Tucson Rent Report

TUCSON, ARIZONA — Apartment List is reporting Tucson rents increased 0.6% month-over-month, compared to a 0.6% decrease nationally. Month-over-month growth in Tucson ranks #44 among the nation’s 100 largest cities. Year-over-year rent growth in Tucson currently stands at 21.7%, compared to 7.8% at this time last year. Year-over-year growth in Tucson ranks #23 among the nation’s 100 largest cities. Rents in Tucson are up by 30.4% since the start of the pandemic in March 2020. Median rents in Tucson currently stand at $1,020 for a 1-bedroom apartment and $1,363 for a two-bedroom.

Tucson rents increase sharply over the past month

Tucson rents have increased 0.6% over the past month, and have increased sharply by 21.7% in comparison to the same time last year. Currently, median rents in Tucson stand at $1,020 for a one-bedroom apartment and $1,363 for a two-bedroom. The city’s rents have been increasing for 21 straight months – the last time rents declined was in May 2020. Tucson’s year-over-year rent growth lags the state average of 26.3%, but exceeds the national average of 17.6%.

Rents rising across cities in Arizona

Throughout the past year, rent increases have been occurring not just in the city of Tucson, but across the entire state. Of the largest 10 cities that we have data for in Arizona, all of them have seen prices rise. The state as a whole logged rent growth of 26.3% over the past year. Here’s a look at how rents compare across some of the largest cities in the state.

  • Looking throughout the state, Scottsdale is the most expensive of all Arizona’s major cities, with a median two-bedroom rent of $2,048; of the 10 largest Arizona cities that we have data for, all have seen rents rise year-over-year, with Mesa experiencing the fastest growth (+29.3%).
  • Scottsdale, Glendale, and Tempe have all experienced year-over-year growth above the state average (28.2%, 27.6%, and 27.4%, respectively).

Tucson rents more affordable than many other large cities nationwide

As rents have increased sharply in Tucson, a few comparable cities nationwide have seen rents grow more modestly. Tucson is still more affordable than most similar cities across the country.

  • Tucson’s median two-bedroom rent of $1,363 is above the national average of $1,294. Nationwide, rents have grown by 17.6% over the past year compared to the 21.7% increase in Tucson.
  • While Tucson’s rents rose sharply over the past year, many cities nationwide also saw increases, including New York City (+34.4%), Miami (+26.9%), and Seattle (+21.5%).
  • Renters will find more reasonable prices in Tucson than most comparable cities. For example, San Francisco has a median 2BR rent of $2,711, which is nearly twice the price in Tucson.

For more information check out our national report. You can also access our full data for cities and counties across the U.S.

Methodology – Recent Updates:

Data from private listing sites, including our own, tends to skew toward luxury apartments, which introduces sample bias when estimates are calculated directly from these listings. To address these limitations, we’ve recently made major updates to our methodology, which we believe have greatly improved the accuracy and reliability of our estimates.

Read more about our new methodology below, or see a more detailed post about the methodology on our blog.

Methodology:

Apartment List is committed to making our rent estimates the best and most accurate available. To do this, we start with reliable median rent statistics from the Census Bureau, then extrapolate them forward to the current month using a growth rate calculated from our listing data. In doing so, we use a same-unit analysis similar to Case-Shiller’s approach, comparing only units that are available across both time periods to provide an accurate picture of rent growth in cities across the country.

Our approach corrects for the sample bias inherent in other private sources, producing results that are much closer to statistics published by the Census Bureau and HUD. Our methodology also allows us to construct a picture of rent growth over an extended period of time, with estimates that are updated each month.

Read more about our methodology.




Multifamily Housing Demand Returns to Higher Density Markets

Per NAHB’s latest Home Building Geography Index (HBGI), through the second half of 2021, multifamily home building rebounded from quarterly declines that began at the outset of the pandemic. In the wake of the public health crisis, there was a pronounced return to higher density markets or geographies, particularly in apartment and other multifamily residential construction.

Comparing the regional geographies’ multifamily growth rates in the fourth quarter of 2020 with that of 2021 shows a clear improvement in pace. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the highest multifamily declines in growth rates were in large metro suburban areas, small metro suburbs, and non-metro/ non-micro counties (rural areas), at -7.8%, -7.0%, and -10.7%, respectively. In contrast, by the fourth quarter of 2021, multifamily home building in non-metro / non-micro counties had the highest growth rate of 91.2%, while large metro core and suburban counties had the lowest growth rates of 21.8% each. Nonetheless this marked a substantial improvement. Still, growth rates were approximately negatively correlated with submarkets of increasing density.

The data show mixed results for when each regional geography reached its lowest growth rate since the first quarter of 2020. All the lower density geographies (small metro counties, micro counties, and rural areas) reached their lowest growth rates at the end of 2020, while large metro core, suburban and outlying counties reached their troughs in the fourth quarter of 2020, first quarter of 2021, and second quarter of 2021, respectively.

Meanwhile, small metro areas, which can be divided into core counties and outlying counties, posted a market share gain of 0.6 percentage points relative to the second quarter and a substantial 2.2 percentage point gain relative to the fourth quarter of 2020.

Major metro suburbs posted a market share gain of 0.3 percentage points relative to the second quarter but retained a 0.2 percentage loss relative to the fourth quarter of 2020 due to prior periods of weakness. Overall, 66.5% of multifamily development occurred within large metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), 27.4% in small MSAs, and 6.1% rural areas and small towns. Small MSAs are those with less than one million total population.

Lower density areas’ higher double-digit growth rates pushed large metro counties’ collective market share down 3.6 percentage points through 2021 to 66.5%.